Criminal Law B exam
9.30 am, 29 October 2007
Okay, this is the end of Criminal Law in law school but this does not mean I can forget everything about it. I am contemplating my sheer dumbness.
Elements Made: Burglary because there is trespass.
There is clearly assault in the question. Naturally, this means I need to write the prosecution have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that there is aggravated burglary and guess what, I didn’t mention about aggravated burglary! How dumb! =(

Policy Questions:
Oh my Lord! I have spent hours and hours over topics which are said to be assessable and end up getting a question which I have a little say about. All I did was ramble about strict and absolute liability, drug offences and sexual offences. With all my precious time preparing for ‘perhaps-in-the-exam-policy-questions-answers’ (instead of sprawling under the sun and have a good run), I didn’t manage to state all the law reforms because I ran out of time.

Note to Law Exams:
They kill students with such a limited amount of time and a whole load of offences which could be made out with so many elements in which the prosecution needs to prove.

Note to Others:
Just because I just so happen to get a HD last semester (which was actually a very borderline HD = 80%), does not mean that I am going to get HD this semesters, or that I am smart, or that I will just get HD even though I said I screwed up the exam or tell you guys that I had not finish my policy question and did badly in the exam.

Long sigh. But I still hope I get an HD, I really did enjoy studying crim because I had a brilliant lecturer and the cases are definitely interesting.

Note to Self:
I know legal theory is very boring, in fact, extremely boring, tremendously boring, awfully boring and possibly the most boring subject in law school, but you are in no position to choose whether or not to do this exam. Just nail it! That means you are to leave now! Shoo!
P/S: I know this is a nerdy post. hah.

